On Mon, 19 May 2014 16:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Shouldn't FAULT_AROUND_ORDER and fault_around_order be changed to be > the order of the fault-around size in bytes, and fault_around_pages() > use 1UL << (fault_around_order - PAGE_SHIFT) Yes. And shame on me for missing it (this time!) at review. There's still time to fix this. Patches, please. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>