On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:36:25PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 05/13/2014 11:45 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >get_pageblock_migratetype() is called during free with IRQs disabled. This
> >is unnecessary and disables IRQs for longer than necessary.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> >Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> With a comment below,
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
>
Thanks
> >---
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >index 3948f0a..fcbf637 100644
> >--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> >+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >@@ -773,9 +773,9 @@ static void __free_pages_ok(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> > if (!free_pages_prepare(page, order))
> > return;
> >
> >+ migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > __count_vm_events(PGFREE, 1 << order);
> >- migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
> > set_freepage_migratetype(page, migratetype);
>
> The line above could be also outside disabled IRQ, no?
>
I guess it could but the difference would be marginal at
best. get_pfnblock_migratetype is a lookup of the pageblock bitfield and is
an expensive operation. set_freepage_migratetype() on the other hand is just
static inline void set_freepage_migratetype(struct page *page, int migratetype)
{
page->index = migratetype;
}
If anything the line could be just removed as right now nothing below
that level is actually using the information (it's primarily of interest
in the per-cpu allocator) but that would be outside the scope of this
patch as move_freepages would also need addressing. I feel the gain is
too marginal to justify the churn.
> > free_one_page(page_zone(page), page, pfn, order, migratetype);
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> >
>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>