On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 01:53:13PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:45:50AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > void unlock_page(struct page *page)
> > {
> > + wait_queue_head_t *wqh = clear_page_waiters(page);
> > +
> > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * No additional barrier needed due to clear_bit_unlock barriering all updates
> > + * before waking waiters
> > + */
> > clear_bit_unlock(PG_locked, &page->flags);
> > - smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
> > - wake_up_page(page, PG_locked);
>
> This is wrong. The smp_mb__after_clear_bit() is still required to ensure
> that the cleared bit is visible before the wakeup on all architectures.
wakeup implies a mb, and I just noticed that our Documentation is
'obsolete' and only mentions it implies a wmb.
Also, if you're going to use smp_mb__after_atomic() you can use
clear_bit() and not use clear_bit_unlock().
---
Subject: doc: Update wakeup barrier documentation
As per commit e0acd0a68ec7 ("sched: fix the theoretical signal_wake_up()
vs schedule() race") both wakeup and schedule now imply a full barrier.
Furthermore, the barrier is unconditional when calling try_to_wake_up()
and has been for a fair while.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 46412bded104..dae5158c2382 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -1881,9 +1881,9 @@ The whole sequence above is available in various canned forms, all of which
event_indicated = 1;
wake_up_process(event_daemon);
-A write memory barrier is implied by wake_up() and co. if and only if they wake
-something up. The barrier occurs before the task state is cleared, and so sits
-between the STORE to indicate the event and the STORE to set TASK_RUNNING:
+A full memory barrier is implied by wake_up() and co. The barrier occurs
+before the task state is cleared, and so sits between the STORE to indicate
+the event and the STORE to set TASK_RUNNING:
CPU 1 CPU 2
=============================== ===============================
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>