Hi Davidlohr,
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 15:16 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hi Manfred,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manfred Spraul
>> <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > the increase of SHMMAX/SHMALL is now a 4 patch series.
>> > I don't have ideas how to improve it further.
>>
>> On the assumption that your patches are heading to mainline, could you
>> send me a man-pages patch for the changes?
>
> Btw, I think that the code could still use some love wrt documentation.
(Agreed.)
> Andrew, please consider this for -next if folks agree. Thanks.
>
> 8<----------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] ipc,shm: document new limits in the uapi header
>
> This is useful in the future and allows users to
> better understand the reasoning behind the changes.
>
> Also use UL as we're dealing with it anyways.
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/shm.h | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/shm.h b/include/uapi/linux/shm.h
> index 74e786d..e37fb08 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/shm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/shm.h
> @@ -8,17 +8,19 @@
> #endif
>
> /*
> - * SHMMAX, SHMMNI and SHMALL are upper limits are defaults which can
Something is wrong in the line above (missing word(s)?) ("are upper
limits are defaults")
> - * be modified by sysctl.
> + * SHMMNI, SHMMAX and SHMALL are the default upper limits which can be
> + * modified by sysctl. Both SHMMAX and SHMALL have their default values
> + * to the maximum limit which is as large as it can be without helping
> + * userspace overflow the values. There is really nothing the kernel
> + * can do to avoid this any variables. It is therefore not advised to
Something is missing in that last line.
> + * make them any larger. This is suitable for both 32 and 64-bit systems.
"This" is not so clear. I suggest replacing with an actual noun.
> */
> -
> #define SHMMIN 1 /* min shared seg size (bytes) */
> #define SHMMNI 4096 /* max num of segs system wide */
> -#define SHMMAX (ULONG_MAX - (1L<<24)) /* max shared seg size (bytes) */
> -#define SHMALL (ULONG_MAX - (1L<<24)) /* max shm system wide (pages) */
> +#define SHMMAX (ULONG_MAX - (1UL << 24)) /* max shared seg size (bytes) */
> +#define SHMALL (ULONG_MAX - (1UL << 24)) /* max shm system wide (pages) */
> #define SHMSEG SHMMNI /* max shared segs per process */
>
> -
> /* Obsolete, used only for backwards compatibility and libc5 compiles */
> struct shmid_ds {
> struct ipc_perm shm_perm; /* operation perms */
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>