Please ignore this set - I found that something can be improved, will send v2 soon. Sorry for the noise. Thanks. On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 04:33:06PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote: > Hi, > > In reply to "[PATCH RFC -mm v2 3/3] memcg, slab: simplify > synchronization scheme" Johannes wrote: > > > I like this patch, but the API names are confusing. Could we fix up > > that whole thing by any chance? > > (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/18/317) > > So this patch set is about cleaning up memcg/kmem naming. > > While preparing it I found that some of the ugly-named functions > constituting interface between memcontrol.c and slab_common.c can be > neatly got rid of w/o complicating the code. Quite the contrary, w/o > them call-flows look much simpler, IMO. So the first four patches do not > rename anything actually - they just rework call-flows in kmem cache > creation/destruction and memcg_caches arrays relocations paths. Finally, > patches 5 and 6 clean up the naming. > > Reviews are appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Vladimir Davydov (6): > memcg: get rid of memcg_create_cache_name > memcg: allocate memcg_caches array on first per memcg cache creation > memcg: cleanup memcg_caches arrays relocation path > memcg: get rid of memcg_{alloc,free}_cache_params > memcg: cleanup kmem cache creation/destruction functions naming > memcg: cleanup kmem_id-related naming > > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 40 +---- > include/linux/slab.h | 12 +- > mm/memcontrol.c | 420 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > mm/slab.c | 4 +- > mm/slab.h | 24 ++- > mm/slab_common.c | 127 ++++++++++---- > mm/slub.c | 10 +- > 7 files changed, 320 insertions(+), 317 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.7.10.4 > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>