Hi Steve, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:22:29AM +0100, Steve Capper wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:46:38PM +0100, Steve Capper wrote: > Just a ping on this... > > I would really like to get huge page support for short descriptors on > ARM merged as I've been carrying around these patches for a long time. > > Recently I've had no issues raised about the code. The patches have > been tested and found to be both beneficial to system performance and > stable. > > There are two parts to the series, the first patch is a core mm/ patch > that introduces some huge_pte_ helper functions that allows for a much > simpler ARM (without LPAE) implementation. The second part is the > actual arch/arm code. > > I'm not sure how to proceed with these patches. I was thinking that > they could be picked up into linux-next? If that sounds reasonable; > Andrew, would you like to take the mm/ patch and Russell could you > please take the arch/arm patches? > > Also, I was hoping to get these into 3.16. Are there any objections to > that? Who is asking for this code? We already support hugepages for LPAE systems, so this would be targetting what? A9? I'm reluctant to add ~400 lines of subtle, low-level mm code to arch/arm/ if it doesn't have any active users. I guess I'm after some commitment that this is (a) useful to somebody and (b) going to be tested regularly, otherwise it will go the way of things like big-endian, where we end up carrying around code which is broken more often than not (although big-endian is more self-contained). Will -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>