Re: Why do we set _PAGE_DIRTY for page tables?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:35 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I just noticed this:
>
> #define _PAGE_TABLE     (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_RW | _PAGE_USER |       \
>                          _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_DIRTY)
> #define _KERNPG_TABLE   (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_RW | _PAGE_ACCESSED |   \
>                          _PAGE_DIRTY)
>
> Is there a reason we set _PAGE_DIRTY for page tables?  It has no
> function, but doesn't do any harm either (the dirty bit is ignored for
> page tables)... it just looks funny to me.

I think it just got copied, and at least the A bit does matter even in
page tables (well, it gets updated, I don't know how much that
"matters"). So the fact that D is ignored is actually the odd man out.

               Linus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]