Re: Dirty/Access bits vs. page content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It builds and boots on ia64 with no new warnings.  I haven't done
> anything more stressful than booting though - so unsure whether
> there are any corners cases that might show up under load.

Thanks. It shouldn't actually change any behavior on ia64 (you'd have
to do any dirty bit batching yourself), I was mainly worried about
compile warnings due to not having the set_page_dirty() declaration
due to some odd header file issues.

               Linus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]