On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 11:26 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: > Hi Davidlohr, > > On 04/18/2014 03:25 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > So a value of 0 bytes or pages, for shmmax and shmall, respectively, > > implies unlimited memory, as opposed to disabling sysv shared memory. > That might be a second risk: > Right now, a sysadmin can prevent sysv memory allocations with > > # sysctl kernel.shmall=0 Yeah, I had pointed this out previously, and it is addressed in the changelog. shmall = 0 directly contradicts size < shmmin = 1, so I don't know who's wrong there... -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>