On 04/16/2014 03:57 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 17:23:31 -0400 Dan Streetman <ddstreet@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> I noticed in your The Perfect Patch doc: >> http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/stuff/tpp.txt >> Section 6b says you don't like 0/N patch series description-only >> emails. Is that still true? Because it seems the majority of patch >> series do include a 0/N descriptive email... > > hm, I think what I said about git there isn't true - merge commits can > contain changelogs. > > Whatever. 0/n is OK and is more email-reader-friendly. I don't mind a 0/n patch if there is lots of history or background or data to be presented, but I find it silly to use a patch 0/1 and patch 1/1 for a single, small patch, like some people do because that is what git wants to do. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>