Re: 0/N patch emails - to use or not to use?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 17:23:31 -0400 Dan Streetman <ddstreet@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> I noticed in your The Perfect Patch doc:
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/stuff/tpp.txt
> Section 6b says you don't like 0/N patch series description-only
> emails.  Is that still true?  Because it seems the majority of patch
> series do include a 0/N descriptive email...

hm, I think what I said about git there isn't true - merge commits can
contain changelogs.

Whatever.  0/n is OK and is more email-reader-friendly.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]