On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:03:36PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> xfs_file_*_read holds an inode lock while calling a generic 'read'
> function. These functions perform read-ahead and are quite likely to
> allocate memory.
Yes, that's what reading data from disk requires.
> So set PF_FSTRANS to ensure they avoid __GFP_FS and so don't recurse
> into a filesystem to free memory.
We already have that protection via the
>
> This can be a problem with loop-back NFS mounts, if free_pages ends up
> wating in nfs_release_page(), and nfsd is blocked waiting for the lock
> that this code holds.
>
> This was found both by lockdep and as a real deadlock during testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 64b48eade91d..88b33ef64668 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ xfs_file_aio_read(
> ssize_t ret = 0;
> int ioflags = 0;
> xfs_fsize_t n;
> + unsigned int pflags;
>
> XFS_STATS_INC(xs_read_calls);
>
> @@ -290,6 +291,10 @@ xfs_file_aio_read(
> * proceeed concurrently without serialisation.
> */
> xfs_rw_ilock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED);
> + /* As we hold a lock, we must ensure that any allocation
> + * in generic_file_aio_read avoid __GFP_FS
> + */
> + current_set_flags_nested(&pflags, PF_FSTRANS);
Ugh. No. This is Simply Wrong.
We handle the memory allocations in the IO path with
GFP_NOFS/KM_NOFS where necessary.
We also do this when setting up regular file inodes in
xfs_setup_inode():
/*
* Ensure all page cache allocations are done from GFP_NOFS context to
* prevent direct reclaim recursion back into the filesystem and blowing
* stacks or deadlocking.
*/
gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping);
mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, (gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_FS)));
Which handles all of the mapping allocations that occur within the
page cache read/write paths.
Remember, you removed the KM_NOFS code from the XFS allocator that
caused it to clear __GFP_FS in an earlier patch - the read Io path
is one of the things you broke by doing that....
If there are places where we don't use GFP_NOFS context allocations
that we should, then we need to fix them individually....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>