>> Our middleware engineers has been complaining about this sysctl limit. >> System administrator need to calculate required sysctl value by making sum >> of all planned middlewares, and middleware provider needs to write "please >> calculate systcl param by....." in their installation manuals. > > Why aren't people just setting the sysctl to a petabyte? What problems > would that lead to? I don't have much Fujitsu middleware knowledges. But I'd like to explain very funny bug I saw. 1. middleware-A suggest to set SHMMAX to very large value (maybe LONG_MAX, but my memory was flushed) 2. middleware-B suggest to set SHMMAX to increase some dozen mega byte. Finally, it was overflow and didn't work at all. Let's demonstrate. # echo 18446744073709551615 > /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax # cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax 18446744073709551615 # echo 18446744073709551616 > /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax # cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax 0 That's why many open source software continue the silly game. But again, I don't have knowledge about Fujitsu middleware. I'm waiting kamezawa-san's answer. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>