On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:29:05 +0900 Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So their system will act as if they had set SHMMAX=enormous. What > > problems could that cause? > > > > > > Look. The 32M thing is causing problems. Arbitrarily increasing the > > arbitrary 32M to an arbitrary 128M won't fix anything - we still have > > the problem. Think bigger, please: how can we make this problem go > > away for ever? > > > > Our middleware engineers has been complaining about this sysctl limit. > System administrator need to calculate required sysctl value by making sum > of all planned middlewares, and middleware provider needs to write "please > calculate systcl param by....." in their installation manuals. Why aren't people just setting the sysctl to a petabyte? What problems would that lead to? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>