On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Eric, did you try this when writing 207205a2ba26 ("kthread: NUMA aware
> > kthread_create_on_node()") or was it always numa_node_id() from the
> > beginning?
>
> Hmm, I think I did not try this, its absolutely possible NUMA_NO_NODE
> was better here.
>
Nishanth, could you change your patch to just return NUMA_NO_NODE for the
non-kthreadd case?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>