Re: [RFC] shmgetfd idea

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/28/2014 02:14 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>
>> But yes, alternatively classic systems may be able to get around the
>> issues via tmpfs quotas and convincing applications to use O_TMPFILE
>> there. But to me this seems less ideal then the Android approach, where
>> the lifecycle of the tmpfs fds more limited and clear.
> 
> Tmpfs supports no quota, it's all a huge hole and unsafe in that
> regard on every system today. But ashmem and kdbus, as they are today,
> are not better.
> 

We can fix that aspect in tmpfs.  Creating new file objcts outside of
filesystems really doesn't make things any better, since our toolbox
around this stuff largely revolves around filesystems.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]