Dave: Please resend the newest form of the patchset. I do not have patch 0 and 1 and I do not see them on linux-mm. On Sat, 11 Jan 2014, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jan 2014, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 01/10/2014 03:39 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > >>> I tested 4 cases, all of these on the "cache-cold kfree()" case. The > > >>> first 3 are with vanilla upstream kernel source. The 4th is patched > > >>> with my new slub code (all single-threaded): > > >>> > > >>> http://www.sr71.net/~dave/intel/slub/slub-perf-20140109.png > > >> > > >> So we're converging on the most complex option. argh. > > > > > > Yeah, looks that way. > > > > Seems like a reasonable compromise between memory usage and allocation speed. > > > > Christoph? > > Fundamentally I think this is good. I need to look at the details but I am > only going to be able to do that next week when I am back in the office. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
