On Monday 13 January 2014 06:33 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:31:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:27:44 -0500 Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> It seems to me to be absolutely silly to have code introduce a warning >>>> yet push the fix for the warning via a completely different tree... >>>> >>> I mixed it up. Sorry. Some how I thought there was some other build >>> configuration thrown the same warning with memblock series and hence >>> suggested the patch to go via Andrew's tree. >> >> Yes, I too had assumed that the warning was caused by the bootmem >> patches in -mm. >> >> But it in fact occurs in Linus's current tree. I'll drop >> mm-arm-fix-arms-__ffs-to-conform-to-avoid-warning-with-no_bootmem.patch >> and I'll assume that rmk will fix this up at an appropriate time. > > Thanks. I'll apply my version and then I can pull Santosh's nobootmem > changes (which I've had a couple of times already) without adding to > the warnings. > Thanks Andrew and Russell for sorting out the patch queue. Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>