On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:31:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:27:44 -0500 Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It seems to me to be absolutely silly to have code introduce a warning > > > yet push the fix for the warning via a completely different tree... > > > > > I mixed it up. Sorry. Some how I thought there was some other build > > configuration thrown the same warning with memblock series and hence > > suggested the patch to go via Andrew's tree. > > Yes, I too had assumed that the warning was caused by the bootmem > patches in -mm. > > But it in fact occurs in Linus's current tree. I'll drop > mm-arm-fix-arms-__ffs-to-conform-to-avoid-warning-with-no_bootmem.patch > and I'll assume that rmk will fix this up at an appropriate time. Thanks. I'll apply my version and then I can pull Santosh's nobootmem changes (which I've had a couple of times already) without adding to the warnings. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad. Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit". -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>