On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 13:58 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:17:45 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Various parts of the kernel acquire and release this mutex,
> > so add i_mmap_lock_write() and immap_unlock_write() helper
> > functions that will encapsulate this logic. The next patch
> > will make use of these.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -478,6 +478,16 @@ struct block_device {
> >
> > int mapping_tagged(struct address_space *mapping, int tag);
> >
> > +static inline void i_mmap_lock_write(struct address_space *mapping)
> > +{
> > + mutex_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
> > +}
>
> I don't understand the thinking behind the "_write". There is no
> "_read" and all callsites use "_write", so why not call it
> i_mmap_lock()?
>
> I *assume* the answer is "so we can later convert some sites to a new
> i_mmap_lock_read()". If so, the changelog should have discussed this.
> If not, still confused.
>
Yes, that's exactly right. I'll resend with an updated changelog.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>