Re: [Results] [RFC PATCH v4 00/40] mm: Memory Power Management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The interleave problem mentioned elsewhere in this thread is possibly a big problem.
> High core counts mean that memory bandwidth can be the bottleneck for several
> workloads.  Dropping, or reducing, the degree of interleaving will seriously impact
> bandwidth (unless your applications are spread out "just right").

In practice this doesn't seem to be that big a problem.

I think because most very memory intensive workloads, use 
all the memory from all the cores, so they effectively interleave
by themselves.

-Andi
-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]