Re: [Results] [RFC PATCH v4 00/40] mm: Memory Power Management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 04:56:32 +0530 "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Experimental Results:
> ====================
> 
> Test setup:
> ----------
> 
> x86 Sandybridge dual-socket quad core HT-enabled machine, with 128GB RAM.
> Memory Region size = 512MB.

Yes, but how much power was saved ;)

Also, the changelogs don't appear to discuss one obvious downside: the
latency incurred in bringing a bank out of one of the low-power states
and back into full operation.  Please do discuss and quantify that to
the best of your knowledge.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]