Hello, Andrew. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 05:52:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I would love to see this patchset go through cgroup tree. The changes to > > memcg is quite small, > > It seems logical to put this in the cgroup tree as that's where most of > the impact occurs. Cool, applying the changes to cgroup/for-3.13. > > and as -mm tree is based on -next it won't cause > > future conflicts. > > That's no longer the case - I'm staging -mm patches ahead of linux-next > now. Except in cases where that's impractical, such as the 3.12 memcg > changes which were pretty heavily impacted by cgroups tree changes. Please note that cgroup is likely to continue to go through a lot of changes for the foreseeable future and memcg is likely to be affected heavily. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>