On 2013/9/23 21:12, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 09:08:16AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:55:20PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: >>> The whole patchset has been acked and reviewed by Michal and Tejun. >>> Could you merge it into mm tree? >> >> Ah... I really hoped that this had been merged during -rc1 window. >> Andrew, would it be okay to carry this series through cgroup tree? It >> doesn't really have much to do with mm proper and it's a PITA to have >> to keep updating css_id code from cgroup side when it's scheduled to >> go away. If carried in -mm, it's likely to cause conflicts with >> ongoing cgroup changes too. I would love to see this patchset go through cgroup tree. The changes to memcg is quite small, and as -mm tree is based on -next it won't cause future conflicts. > > Also, wasn't this already in -mm during the last devel cycle? ISTR > conflicts with it in -mm with other cgroup core changes. Is there any > specific reason why this wasn't merged during the merge windw? > No, it never went into -mm tree... I guess it's because Andrew was too busy and overlooked this patchset? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>