On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:31:52 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > force_page_cache_readahead() may fail, so need let the related upper > system calls know about it by its return value. > > Also let related code pass "scripts/checkpatch.pl's" checking. > > --- a/mm/fadvise.c > +++ b/mm/fadvise.c > @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(fadvise64_64, int, fd, loff_t, offset, loff_t, len, int, advice) > * Ignore return value because fadvise() shall return > * success even if filesystem can't retrieve a hint, > */ ^^ look. > - force_page_cache_readahead(mapping, f.file, start_index, > - nrpages); > + ret = force_page_cache_readahead(mapping, f.file, start_index, > + nrpages); > break; -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>