On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:13:03PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 08/01/2013 01:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >> > "memory" is the name used by the current sysfs memory layout code in > >> > drivers/base/memory.c. So it can't be the same unless we are going to > >> > create a toggle a boot time to select between the models, which is > >> > something I am looking to add if this code/design is acceptable to > >> > people. > > I know it can't be the same, but this is like "memory_v2" or something, > > right? I suggest you make it an either/or option, given that you feel > > the existing layout just will not work properly for you. > > If there are existing tools or applications that look for memory hotplug > events, how does this interact with those? I know you guys have control > over the ppc software that actually performs the probe/online > operations, but what about other apps? After taking a closer look, I've decided to rework this to preserve more of the existing layout. Should be posting it next Monday. > > I also don't seem to see the original post to LKML. Did you send > privately to Greg, then he cc'd LKML on his reply? Yeah :-/ My mail relay settings were messed up and my system tried to deliver the mail directly to recipients; some of which worked and some failed (spam/firewall filters, etc). Sigh... Seth -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>