On 08/01/2013 01:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> > "memory" is the name used by the current sysfs memory layout code in >> > drivers/base/memory.c. So it can't be the same unless we are going to >> > create a toggle a boot time to select between the models, which is >> > something I am looking to add if this code/design is acceptable to >> > people. > I know it can't be the same, but this is like "memory_v2" or something, > right? I suggest you make it an either/or option, given that you feel > the existing layout just will not work properly for you. If there are existing tools or applications that look for memory hotplug events, how does this interact with those? I know you guys have control over the ppc software that actually performs the probe/online operations, but what about other apps? I also don't seem to see the original post to LKML. Did you send privately to Greg, then he cc'd LKML on his reply? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>