Re: Possible deadloop in direct reclaim?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi KOSAKI,

On 08/01/2013 10:45 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

> 
> Please read more older code. Your pointed code is temporary change and I
> changed back for fixing
> bugs.
> If you look at the status in middle direct reclaim, we can't avoid race
> condition from multi direct
> reclaim issues. Moreover, if kswapd doesn't awaken, it is a problem.
> This is a reason why current code
> behave as you described.
> I agree we should fix your issue as far as possible. But I can't agree
> your analysis.
> 

I found this thread:
mm, vmscan: fix do_try_to_free_pages() livelock
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/14/74

I think that's the same issue Lisa met.

But I didn't find out why your patch didn't get merged?
There were already many acks.

-- 
Regards,
-Bob

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]