Re: [PATCH 0/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/16/2013 09:10 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 07:40:16PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> writes:

First 5 patches are almost trivial clean-up patches.

The others are for fixing three bugs.
Perhaps, these problems are minor, because this codes are used
for a long time, and there is no bug reporting for these problems.

These patches are based on v3.10.0 and
passed sanity check of libhugetlbfs.
does that mean you had run with libhugetlbfs test suite ?
Yes! I can't find any reggression on libhugetlbfs test suite.

Where can get your test case?


-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]