Re: [PATCH 0/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 07:40:16PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > First 5 patches are almost trivial clean-up patches.
> >
> > The others are for fixing three bugs.
> > Perhaps, these problems are minor, because this codes are used
> > for a long time, and there is no bug reporting for these problems.
> >
> > These patches are based on v3.10.0 and
> > passed sanity check of libhugetlbfs.
> 
> does that mean you had run with libhugetlbfs test suite ?

Yes! I can't find any reggression on libhugetlbfs test suite.

>  
> -aneesh
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]