Re: [PATCH 13/15] sched: Set preferred NUMA node based on number of private faults

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 12:09:00AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> The third reason is that multiple threads in a process will race each
> other to fault the shared page making the fault information unreliable.

Ingo and I played around with that particular issue for a while and we had a
patch that worked fairly well for cpu bound threads and made sure the
task_numa_work() thing indeed interleaved between the threads and wasn't done
by the same thread every time.

I don't know what the current code does and if that is indeed still an issue.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]