On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 12:09:00AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > @@ -582,11 +582,11 @@ static inline pte_t maybe_mkwrite(pte_t pte, struct vm_area_struct *vma) > * sets it, so none of the operations on it need to be atomic. > */ > > -/* Page flags: | [SECTION] | [NODE] | ZONE | [LAST_NID] | ... | FLAGS | */ > +/* Page flags: | [SECTION] | [NODE] | ZONE | [LAST_NIDPID] | ... | FLAGS | */ > #define SECTIONS_PGOFF ((sizeof(unsigned long)*8) - SECTIONS_WIDTH) > #define NODES_PGOFF (SECTIONS_PGOFF - NODES_WIDTH) > #define ZONES_PGOFF (NODES_PGOFF - ZONES_WIDTH) > -#define LAST_NID_PGOFF (ZONES_PGOFF - LAST_NID_WIDTH) > +#define LAST_NIDPID_PGOFF (ZONES_PGOFF - LAST_NIDPID_WIDTH) I saw the same with Ingo's patch doing the similar thing. But why do we fuse these two into a single field? Would it not make more sense to have them be separate fields? Yes I get we update and read them together, and we could still do that with appropriate helper function, but they are two independent values stored in the page flags. Its not something I care too much about, just something that strikes me as weird. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>