07/02/2013 11:38 PM, Andrew Morton пишет:
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 21:44:47 +0400 Maxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
The feature prevents mistrusted filesystems to grow a large number of dirty
pages before throttling. For such filesystems balance_dirty_pages always
check bdi counters against bdi limits. I.e. even if global "nr_dirty" is under
"freerun", it's not allowed to skip bdi checks. The only use case for now is
fuse: it sets bdi max_ratio to 1% by default and system administrators are
supposed to expect that this limit won't be exceeded.
The feature is on if address space is marked by AS_STRICTLIMIT flag.
A filesystem may set the flag when it initializes a new inode.
Changed in v2 (thanks to Andrew Morton):
- added a few explanatory comments
- cleaned up the mess in backing_dev_info foo_stamp fields: now it's clearly
stated that bw_time_stamp is measured in jiffies; renamed other foo_stamp
fields to reflect that they are in units of number-of-pages.
Better, thanks.
The writeback arithemtic makes my head spin - I'd really like Fengguang
to go over this, please.
A quick visit from the spelling police:
Great! Thank you, Andrew. I'll wait for Fengguang' feedback for a while
before respin.
...
@@ -41,8 +43,15 @@ typedef int (congested_fn)(void *, int);
enum bdi_stat_item {
BDI_RECLAIMABLE,
BDI_WRITEBACK,
- BDI_DIRTIED,
- BDI_WRITTEN,
+
+ /*
+ * The three counters below reflects number of events of specific type
+ * happened since bdi_init(). The type is defined in comments below:
"The three counters below reflect the number of events of specific
types since bdi_init()"
+ */
+ BDI_DIRTIED, /* a page was dirtied */
+ BDI_WRITTEN, /* writeout completed for a page */
+ BDI_WRITTEN_BACK, /* a page went to writeback */
+
NR_BDI_STAT_ITEMS
};
...
@@ -680,28 +712,55 @@ static unsigned long bdi_position_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
return 0;
/*
- * global setpoint
+ * The strictlimit feature is a tool preventing mistrusted filesystems
+ * to grow a large number of dirty pages before throttling. For such
"from growing"
+ * filesystems balance_dirty_pages always checks bdi counters against
+ * bdi limits. Even if global "nr_dirty" is under "freerun". This is
+ * especially important for fuse who sets bdi->max_ratio to 1% by
s/who/which/
+ * default. Without strictlimit feature, fuse writeback may consume
+ * arbitrary amount of RAM because it is accounted in
+ * NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP which is not involved in calculating "nr_dirty".
...
@@ -994,6 +1054,26 @@ static void bdi_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
* keep that period small to reduce time lags).
*/
step = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * For strictlimit case, balanced_dirty_ratelimit was calculated
balance_dirty_ratelimit?
+ * above based on bdi counters and limits (see bdi_position_ratio()).
+ * Hence, to calculate "step" properly, we have to use bdi_dirty as
+ * "dirty" and bdi_setpoint as "setpoint".
+ *
+ * We rampup dirty_ratelimit forcibly if bdi_dirty is low because
+ * it's possible that bdi_thresh is close to zero due to inactivity
+ * of backing device (see the implementation of bdi_dirty_limit()).
+ */
+ if (unlikely(strictlimit)) {
+ dirty = bdi_dirty;
+ if (bdi_dirty < 8)
+ setpoint = bdi_dirty + 1;
+ else
...
@@ -1057,18 +1140,32 @@ void __bdi_update_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
if (elapsed > HZ && time_before(bdi->bw_time_stamp, start_time))
goto snapshot;
+ /*
+ * Skip periods when backing dev was idle due to abscence of pages
"absence"
+ * under writeback (when over_bground_thresh() returns false)
+ */
+ if (test_bit(BDI_idle, &bdi->state) &&
+ bdi->writeback_nr_stamp == writeback)
...
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>