Re: [PATCHv4 27/39] x86-64, mm: proper alignment mappings with hugepages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 06:23 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > +static inline unsigned long mapping_align_mask(struct address_space *mapping)
> > +{
> > +	if (mapping_can_have_hugepages(mapping))
> > +		return PAGE_MASK & ~HPAGE_MASK;
> > +	return get_align_mask();
> > +}
> 
> get_align_mask() appears to be a bit more complicated to me than just a
> plain old mask.  Are you sure you don't need to pick up any of its
> behavior for the mapping_can_have_hugepages() case?

get_align_mask() never returns more strict mask then we do in
mapping_can_have_hugepages() case.

I can modify it this way:

        unsigned long mask = get_align_mask();

        if (mapping_can_have_hugepages(mapping))
                mask &= PAGE_MASK & ~HPAGE_MASK;
        return mask;

But it looks more confusing for me. What do you think?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]