Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] mm/writeback: Don't check force_wait to handle bdi->work_list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 09:46:15PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>  fs/fs-writeback.c |   10 ++--------
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>The header file should be changed, too. Otherwise looks fine to me.
>
>include/linux/writeback.h:97:long wb_do_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, int force_wait);

Thanks for your review, Fengguang. ;-)

The line in header file has already been removed by commit(836f29bbb0:
fs/fs-writeback.c: : make wb_do_writeback() as static) in -next tree
since there is just one caller in fs/fs-writeback.c.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li 

>
>Thanks,
>Fengguang
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
>see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]