On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 05:50:46PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > >> > Gilad Ben-Yossef has been posting patches that address this issue in Feb > >> > 2012. Ccing him. Can we see your latest work, Gilead? > >> > >> Is it this one? > >> > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/3/269 > > > > Yes that is it. Maybe the scheme there could be generalized so that other > > subsystems can also use this to disable their threads if nothing is going > > on? Or integrate the monitoring into the notick logic somehow? > > > > I respinned the original patch based on feedback from Christoph for > 3.2 and even did some light testing then, but got distracted and never > posted the result. > > I've just ported them over to 3.10 and they merge (with a small fix > due to deferred workqueue API changes) and build. I did not try to run > this version though. > I'll post them as replies to this message. > > I'd be happy to rescue them from the "TODO" pile... :-) Please! ;-) Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>