On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >> > Gilad Ben-Yossef has been posting patches that address this issue in Feb >> > 2012. Ccing him. Can we see your latest work, Gilead? >> >> Is it this one? >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/3/269 > > Yes that is it. Maybe the scheme there could be generalized so that other > subsystems can also use this to disable their threads if nothing is going > on? Or integrate the monitoring into the notick logic somehow? > I respinned the original patch based on feedback from Christoph for 3.2 and even did some light testing then, but got distracted and never posted the result. I've just ported them over to 3.10 and they merge (with a small fix due to deferred workqueue API changes) and build. I did not try to run this version though. I'll post them as replies to this message. I'd be happy to rescue them from the "TODO" pile... :-) -- Gilad Ben-Yossef Chief Coffee Drinker gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Israel Cell: +972-52-8260388 US Cell: +1-973-8260388 http://benyossef.com "If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a situation where the homework eats your dog?" -- Jean-Baptiste Queru -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>