Re: [PATCH 0/2] hugetlb fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 18 June 2013 13:27:05 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:50:55 -0400 J__rn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 18 June 2013 14:47:03 -0400, Joern Engel wrote:
> > > 
> > > Test program below is failing before these two patches and passing
> > > after.
> > 
> > Actually, do we have a place to stuff kernel tests?  And if not,
> > should we have one?
> 
> Yep, tools/testing/selftests/vm.  It's pretty simple and stupid at
> present - it anything about the framework irritates you, please fix it!

Just did. :)

Jörn

--
Maintenance in other professions and of other articles is concerned with
the return of the item to its original state; in Software, maintenance
is concerned with moving an item away from its original state.
-- Les Belady

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]