On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:50:55 -0400 J__rn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 18 June 2013 14:47:03 -0400, Joern Engel wrote: > > > > Test program below is failing before these two patches and passing > > after. > > Actually, do we have a place to stuff kernel tests? And if not, > should we have one? Yep, tools/testing/selftests/vm. It's pretty simple and stupid at present - it anything about the framework irritates you, please fix it! General guidelines for tools/testing/selftests: the tool should execute quickly and shouldn't break the overall selftests run at either compile time or runtime if kernel features are absent, Kconfig is unexpected, etc. It's more a "place to accumulate and maintain selftest programs" than a serious self-testing framework. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>