On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 10:52:40AM +0100, Steve Capper wrote: > Under ARM64, PTEs can be broadly categorised as follows: > - Present and valid: Bit #0 is set. The PTE is valid and memory > access to the region may fault. > > - Present and invalid: Bit #0 is clear and bit #1 is set. > Represents present memory with PROT_NONE protection. The PTE > is an invalid entry, and the user fault handler will raise a > SIGSEGV. > > - Not present (file): Bits #0 and #1 are clear, bit #2 is set. > Memory represented has been paged out. The PTE is an invalid > entry, and the fault handler will try and re-populate the > memory where necessary. > > Huge PTEs are block descriptors that have bit #1 clear. If we wish > to represent PROT_NONE huge PTEs we then run into a problem as > there is no way to distinguish between regular and huge PTEs if we > set bit #1. > > As huge PTEs are always present, the meaning of bits #1 and #2 can > be swapped for invalid PTEs. This patch swaps the PTE_FILE and > PTE_PROT_NONE constants, allowing us to represent PROT_NONE huge > PTEs. I guess we'll never get a huge_(pte|pmd)_file() (but we can shift the file bits up anyway). > Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@xxxxxxxxxx> Apart from the comments you already got: Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>