On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 03:29:34PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:06:21AM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > With the dentry LRUs being per-sb structures, there is no real need > > for a global dentry_lru_lock. The locking can be made more > > fine-grained by moving to a per-sb LRU lock, isolating the LRU > > operations of different filesytsems completely from each other. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> > > Doesn't apply to a current linus tree. What is this patchset based No, this is too painful. It doesn't apply to a 3.9 tree, and it BUG-ONs in the dcache on a current Linus tree, probably because I didn't resolve one of the 10 or so patches that didn't apply correctly.... So, I'm going to wait until there's a version that applies to the current TOT and go from there.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>