Re: [PATCH v5 04/31] dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:06:21AM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> With the dentry LRUs being per-sb structures, there is no real need
> for a global dentry_lru_lock. The locking can be made more
> fine-grained by moving to a per-sb LRU lock, isolating the LRU
> operations of different filesytsems completely from each other.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>

Doesn't apply to a current linus tree. What is this patchset based
on?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]