2013/04/19 8:28, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:33 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
:
+static struct resource *get_resource(gfp_t flags)
+{
+ struct resource *res = NULL;
+
+ spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
+ if (bootmem_resource.sibling) {
+ res = bootmem_resource.sibling;
+ bootmem_resource.sibling = res->sibling;
+ memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
I prefer to keep memset() outside of the spin lock.
spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
if (..) {
:
spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
} else {
spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);
}
Hmm. It is a little ugly. How about it?
spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
if (bootmem_resource.sibling) {
res = bootmem_resource.sibling;
bootmem_resource.sibling = res->sibling;
}
spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
if (res)
memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
else
res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);
Sounds good to me.
Great. I'll update it.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>