On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:33 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
:
> >
> >> +static struct resource *get_resource(gfp_t flags)
> >> +{
> >> + struct resource *res = NULL;
> >> +
> >> + spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> >> + if (bootmem_resource.sibling) {
> >> + res = bootmem_resource.sibling;
> >> + bootmem_resource.sibling = res->sibling;
> >> + memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
> >> + }
> >> + spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> >
>
> > I prefer to keep memset() outside of the spin lock.
> >
> > spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> > if (..) {
> > :
> > spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> > memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
> > } else {
> > spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> > res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);
> > }
>
> Hmm. It is a little ugly. How about it?
>
> spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
> if (bootmem_resource.sibling) {
> res = bootmem_resource.sibling;
> bootmem_resource.sibling = res->sibling;
> }
> spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
>
> if (res)
> memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
> else
> res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);
Sounds good to me.
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>