Quoting Glauber Costa (glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx): > On 04/01/2013 04:38 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Glauber Costa (glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx): > >> Hi, > >> > >> Notes: > >> ====== > >> > >> This is v2 of memcg-aware LRU shrinking. I've been testing it extensively > >> and it behaves well, at least from the isolation point of view. However, > >> I feel some more testing is needed before we commit to it. Still, this is > >> doing the job fairly well. Comments welcome. > > > > Do you have any performance tests (preferably with enough runs with and > > without this patchset to show 95% confidence interval) to show the > > impact this has? Certainly the feature sounds worthwhile, but I'm > > curious about the cost of maintaining this extra state. > > > > -serge > > > Not yet. I intend to include them in my next run. I haven't yet decided > on a set of tests to run (maybe just a memcg-contained kernel compile?) > > So if you have suggestions of what I could run to show this, feel free > to lay them down here. Perhaps mount a 4G tmpfs, copy kernel tree there, and build kernel on that tmpfs? -serge -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>