On 04/01/2013 04:38 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Glauber Costa (glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx): >> Hi, >> >> Notes: >> ====== >> >> This is v2 of memcg-aware LRU shrinking. I've been testing it extensively >> and it behaves well, at least from the isolation point of view. However, >> I feel some more testing is needed before we commit to it. Still, this is >> doing the job fairly well. Comments welcome. > > Do you have any performance tests (preferably with enough runs with and > without this patchset to show 95% confidence interval) to show the > impact this has? Certainly the feature sounds worthwhile, but I'm > curious about the cost of maintaining this extra state. > > -serge > Not yet. I intend to include them in my next run. I haven't yet decided on a set of tests to run (maybe just a memcg-contained kernel compile?) So if you have suggestions of what I could run to show this, feel free to lay them down here. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>