On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 06:13:42 +0000 "Hampson, Steven T" <steven.t.hampson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Using mbind to change the mempolicy to MPOL_BIND on several adjacent > mmapped blocks > may result in a reset of the mempolicy to MPOL_DEFAULT in vma_adjust. > > ... > > --- a/mm/mmap.c > +++ b/mm/mmap.c > @@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ again: remove_next = 1 + (end > next->vm_end); > if (next->anon_vma) > anon_vma_merge(vma, next); > mm->map_count--; > - mpol_put(vma_policy(next)); > + vma_set_policy(vma, vma_policy(next)); > kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, next); > /* > * In mprotect's case 6 (see comments on vma_merge), Is this missing an mpol_put(vma_policy(vma))? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>