Hello, Christoph. On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:35:22AM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, JoonSoo Kim wrote: > > > With flushing, deactivate_slab() occur and it has some overhead to > > deactivate objects. > > If my patch properly fix this situation, it is better to use mine > > which has no overhead. > > Well this occurs during boot and its not that performance critical. Hmm... Yes, this is not performance critical place, but why do we use a sub-optimal solution? And flushing is abstration for complicated logic, so I think that my raw implemntation is better for understanding. But, I have no objection to merge Glauber's one if you think that is better. Thanks. > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>