2013/2/23 Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote: > >> On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: >> > Argh. This one was the final version: >> > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/ >> > >> >> It seems it would work. It is all the same to me. >> Which one do you prefer? > > Flushing seems to be simpler and less code. > Hello, Christoph, Glauber. With flushing, deactivate_slab() occur and it has some overhead to deactivate objects. If my patch properly fix this situation, it is better to use mine which has no overhead. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>