On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:39:11 -0500 Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We're now hitting the VM_BUG_ON() which was added in the last hunk of the > patch: hm, why was that added. Michel, I seem to have confused myself over this series. I saw a report this morning which led me to drop mm-accelerate-munlock-treatment-of-thp-pages.patch but now I can't find that report and I'm wondering if I should have dropped mm-accelerate-mm_populate-treatment-of-thp-pages.patch instead. Given that and Sasha's new report I think I'll drop mm-use-long-type-for-page-counts-in-mm_populate-and-get_user_pages.patch mm-use-long-type-for-page-counts-in-mm_populate-and-get_user_pages-fix.patch mm-use-long-type-for-page-counts-in-mm_populate-and-get_user_pages-fix-fix.patch mm-accelerate-mm_populate-treatment-of-thp-pages.patch mm-accelerate-munlock-treatment-of-thp-pages.patch and let's start again? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>